I’m Pro-Life, And I Don’t Care About the Supreme Court

Photo by skeeze / www.pixabay.com

By Matthew Tyson

As a pro-life advocate, I honestly don’t care a bit about who is on the Supreme Court.

I want to repeat that for the sake of clarity.

When it comes to abortion, I do not care if the SCOTUS leans more to the left or to the right. It does not matter, because it’s not going to make a difference.

The biggest myth sold to the pro-life movement is that Republican presidents appointing Conservative justices are crucial in the fight against abortion. And yet, both Roe vs. Wade AND Planned Parenthood vs. Casey were decided with a conservative majority. Not only that, but over the last 45 years, we’ve had 9 Republican House majorities, 10 Senate majorities, and 5 Republican Presidents, none of which have been successful in ending abortion. Furthermore, time, after time, after time, after time, after time, after time, after time, after time, legislation restricting abortion was either found unconstitutional or failed to make it to law.

The biggest myth sold to the pro-life movement is that Republican presidents appointing Conservative justices are crucial in the fight against abortion.

Yet, major Pro-Life organizations such as Priests for Life, National Right to Life, and the Susan B. Anthony List continue to push the narrative that we must elect Republicans, because they will put pro-life justices on the bench, which will give us the upper hand in the fight against abortion.

But here is the truth of the matter that all of us in the pro-life movement need to accept: fighting abortion in the courts will never play out in our favor. It is not a proper means to an end because this issue is significantly more complex than we realize.

If we want to effectively end abortion, we need to stop focusing on where and how, and start focusing on why. What drives a woman to abort her child in the first place and what can we do to alleviate it?

Even if we were to successfully overturn Roe v Wade, the matter would only be sent back to the states, over half of which would keep abortion legal. That’s not an honest win to anyone who is serious about being pro-life. At best, it would serve as a nice symbolic victory, but it wouldn’t address the actual reasons that women give for terminating a (usually unexpected) pregnancy, which—as I’ve pointed out in a previous post—are primarily:

∙      Dramatic change in life, including potential job loss, and/or concern over other children or dependents.

∙      Financial instability, including a lack of access to childcare and/or healthcare.

Or in other words: no money, no healthcare, no support, and fear.

What restrictive legislation has attempted to address these issues? What is to become of these women in a post-Roe world? Have we actually considered these questions? Have we honestly weighed the consequences? Or have we been so busy opposing the politicians and activists who support abortion that we’ve ignored the women who are actually having them?

We have to think deeper. We can sit here and talk about oughts, and rights, and sexual morality until we’re blue in the face, but if we want to make any real progress, we have to face up to the fact that most of the women having abortions aren’t privileged, liberal femi-nazis. They’re women in poverty who feel like they don’t have another option. The fear of not being able to provide for the child, of losing their job, of not having access to proper healthcare, or of not having a support system is painfully coercive. And if we’re going call ourselves pro-life, that’s where we need to focus our attention.

Make no mistake: I live for the day that abortion is eradicated from our world. But the Supreme Court is not an effective means for achieving this goal.

Make no mistake: I live for the day that abortion is eradicated from our world. But the Supreme Court is not an effective means for achieving this goal. It’s time for those of us in the pro-life movement to refocus our strategy, do away with idea that the GOP is the party of life, and start providing comprehensive solutions that address real needs instead of chasing our tails in a continuous circle.

What is it they say about doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results?

Matthew Tyson is a Catholic convert and pro-life Democrat living in Alabama. He writes about the intersection of faith and politics in the 21st Century. In 2013, after a great period of spiritual wandering, he converted to the Catholic Church, and shortly thereafter, founded the Mackerel Snapper Blog to share the faith with others. A version of this article first appeared on the Mackerel Snapper blog on Patheos.

In his free time, Matthew enjoys relaxing with a glass of bourbon and spending time with his wife and children. He is an avid reader, Netflix aficionado, and fan of all things espionage. Contact Matthew via e-mail (matthewallentyson@gmail.com) or Twitter @MattTysonWrites.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

You May Also Want to Read

  • by Martin Luther King, Jr. Thou Eternal God, out of whose absolute power and infinite intelligence the whole universe has…

  • By Nikki Toyama-Szeto Over the past few days, I’ve seen a lot of focus on “evangelicals” in the media, particularly…

Comment policy: ESA represents a wide variety of understandings and practices surrounding our shared Christian faith. The purpose of the ESA blog is to facilitate loving conversation; please know that individual authors do not speak for ESA as a whole. Even if you don\'t see yourself or your experience reflected in something you read here, we invite you to experience it anyway, and see if God can meet you there. What can take away from considering this point of view? What might you add? The comments section below is where you can share the answers to those questions, if you feel so moved. Please express your thoughts in ways that are constructive, purposeful, and respectful. Give those you disagree with the benefit of the doubt, and assume they are neither idiots nor evil. Name-calling, sweeping condemnations, and any other comments that suggest you have forgotten that we are all children of God will be deleted. Thank you!

4 Responses

  1. Patricia A. Williams says:

    It is not just about women and abortion, it is also about the men who reject them and who will not take responsibility for their actions and the consequences of their actions. Sometimes pressures by these men cause abortions too. We are putting too much emphasis on the one sin and not on all sins.

    • Kevin says:

      The whole notion of men “abandoning” the mother & child is a Feminist myth. There’s too much propensity to cut the fathers out of the loop, to lie about paternity, even to play games with birth control. Plenty of young fathers want in the lives of their kids, but the mother isn’t allowing it.

  2. Kevin says:

    I understand your frustration, but I disagree with you that sending it back to the states would be a pyrrhic victory. There are several states that enacted restrictions that the SCOTUS overrode that would come into effect once the courts no longer had a say about it. What needs to happen is that Congress should rule to strip the Courts of Jurisdiction over abortion as a legal issue. Barring the courts from having the authority to rule in certain cases has been done before.

  3. Nancy says:

    Matthew, you have just eloquently stated what I have been thinking for some time! Thank you!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *