Should We Call It Sin?

Naming gross economic inequality in the US

by Ron Sider

greed -

At a conference a couple of years ago at the University of Pennsylvania, Harvard Professor Robert D. Putnam asked to eat lunch with me. I was delighted to accept his invitation since Professor Putnam (author of best-sellers like Bowling Alone and American Grace) has been called by the Sunday Times of London the "most influential academic in the world today."

Putnam wanted to tell me about the new book he is working on and ask me an important question. He is appalled by the radical lack of equality of opportunity in the US today. And he wanted to know if evangelical preachers would dare to say what his pastor said when Putnam was a teenager. In the midst of Martin Luther King Jr.'s great campaign against segregation, Putnam's devout Methodist pastor dared to preach that "racism is a sin."

Professor Putnam wanted to ask me, as an evangelical, whether evangelical pastors today would be ready to declare that great economic inequality of opportunity is a sin. That's a great question.

In my book Fixing the Moral Deficit: A Balanced Way to Balance the Budget, I argue that the Bible does not promote equality of income or wealth. When laziness and other forms of sin result in less income, inequality is appropriate. When parents rightly pass on an inheritance of skill and wealth to children, some inequality is proper. When the economic rewards of work create incentives for creativity and diligence, some inequality is desirable.

On the other hand, I believe the Bible suggests at least two limits on inequality. For one, the biblical principle of justice demands that every person and family has access to the productive resources so that if they act responsibly they can earn a decent living and be dignified members of society. Whenever the extremes of wealth and poverty prevent some people from having access to adequate productive resources, or make it difficult, then that inequality is unjust, wrong, sinful, and must be corrected.

The second limitation on inequality flows from the biblical understanding of sin and power. In a fallen world, whenever one group of people acquires excessive unbalanced power, they will almost always use it for their own selfish advantage.

In a fallen world, whenever one group of people acquires excessive unbalanced power, they will almost always use it for their own selfish advantage.

So how should we evaluate the extreme inequality in income, wealth, and power in the US today? American economic inequality today is greater than at any time since 1928 just before the Great Depression.

In 2004 the richest 0.1 percent had more income than the poorest 120 million. If you divided the total US income among 1,000 people, the richest person (one person!) would have as much income as the poorest 387!

Between 1993 and 2007, more than half of all the increase in income in the US went to the richest 1 percent. Between 2002 and 2007, 66 percent of all increased income went to the richest 1 percent. And in 2009-2010, 93 percent of all the increased income in the US went to the richest 1 percent.

The richest 1 percent of Americans own more than the bottom 90 percent.

Over the last three decades, the average annual income of the richest 1 percent has jumped by $700,000 while the average Joe has actually lost ground. The poorest 20 percent had less income in 2009 than they did in 1979. About 50 million Americans are in poverty.

Today there is much greater inequality and less equality of opportunity in the US than in "aristocratic" Europe.

Making things even worse, some prominent politicians say that our serious budget deficit means that we must slash effective programs that empower poor people. House Republicans have called for cutting $128 billion from food stamps; cutting Pell grants that help poor kids afford college from $5,500 to $3,000; and cutting effective foreign aid that saves the lives of millions around the world. At the same time, they want to give more tax cuts to the richest Americans.

There are ways that public policy could move us away from today's gross inequality and back toward more equality of opportunity. We should maintain effective programs that care for and empower poor people. We should spend enough on minority urban education so that everyone, not just white suburbanites, receives an education that offers vastly expanded equality of opportunity. We should increase taxes somewhat on rich Americans and tax income from dividends at the same rate as other income. Yes, we must greatly reduce our ongoing federal budget deficit over the next five years, but we need not—and should not!—do it on the backs of the poor.

It is time for evangelical preachers to label today's gross inequality what it is: SIN. If we believe what the bible says about God's concern for the poor, if we believe what the Bible says about justice, then we must denounce the gross inequality of opportunity and income in our country today as blatantly sinful.

Ron Sider is founder and president emeritus of Evangelicals for Social Action.

(image courtesy of

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

You May Also Want to Read

Comment policy: ESA represents a wide variety of understandings and practices surrounding our shared Christian faith. The purpose of the ESA blog is to facilitate loving conversation; please know that individual authors do not speak for ESA as a whole. Even if you don\'t see yourself or your experience reflected in something you read here, we invite you to experience it anyway, and see if God can meet you there. What can take away from considering this point of view? What might you add? The comments section below is where you can share the answers to those questions, if you feel so moved. Please express your thoughts in ways that are constructive, purposeful, and respectful. Give those you disagree with the benefit of the doubt, and assume they are neither idiots nor evil. Name-calling, sweeping condemnations, and any other comments that suggest you have forgotten that we are all children of God will be deleted. Thank you!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.