No-Tax Pledges

by Aaron Foltz (Sider scholar)

A new poll out from Quinnipiac University shows that 77% of Republicans do not want their members of Congress to sign pledges to never raise taxes on the wealthy—77%, which is also known as a majority. This poll indicates that most Republicans are not buying into the rigid politicking that no-tax pledges represent.

Overall, 85% of Americans agree that no-tax pledges are a bad idea. In a political environment that can seem incredibly polarized, it is interesting that most Americans are eschewing the method of uncompromising politics that no-tax pledges represent. Most Democrats and independent voters support higher taxes on individuals that are making more than $250,000 a year, and Republicans are only slightly opposed to that measure (53% opposed, 41% in favor). Again, this poll is showing that the polarized political environment that is commonly portrayed might not be accurate.

Either of two things could be occurring: The poll is flawed, which is unlikely considering the source, or the image of an ultra-polarized American political environment is flawed. Media often paint a picture of an America deeply divided over differing ideologies. Pundits consistently warn of internal and external threats to the "true American way." Politicians talk about uncompromisingly representing what their constituency "really wants." If this poll is correct, then those images projected are a gross misrepresentation of the actual beliefs of most Americans.

While politicians play fiscal chicken over the fiscal cliff, this poll shows an American people that are much more willing to compromise and work alongside individuals with differing political beliefs to provide a better future for America. Perhaps Americans are going to hold their representatives accountable for the inflexible manner with which they have been conducting themselves in leadership.  Politicians, if convinced by their population and not by corporations, could truly take their cues from the communities that they are representing and work across ideological aisles to pass essential legislation to avoid fiscal dramas.

This would be wonderful news for Christians concerned with justice for the poor and the oppressed in our country. God is not a Democrat or a Republican. Both political parties have elements in their platforms that would move America to a more just environment, which shows just how important it is to collaborate politically. President Obama has consistently extended honest offers to negotiate with Republicans in order to come to a just deal to avoid fiscal crisis. In John Boehner's reigning in of several Republican House members who were extremely divisive with regards to fiscal negotiations, Republican leadership has also taken a serious step away from the stubbornness that has defined the last four years. Willingness to collaborate on issues that are as ideologically divisive as taxation show a glimmer of hope that politicians are willing to move forward, look past differences and attempt to lead the country towards a just future.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

You May Also Want to Read

  • By Audette Fulbright Fulson Did you rise this morning, broken and hung over with weariness and pain and rage tattered…

  • By R. Anderson Campbell and Steve Sherwood It's easy to look at the campaign rhetoric during the previous 18 months and…

Comment policy: ESA represents a wide variety of understandings and practices surrounding our shared Christian faith. The purpose of the ESA blog is to facilitate loving conversation; please know that individual authors do not speak for ESA as a whole. Even if you don\'t see yourself or your experience reflected in something you read here, we invite you to experience it anyway, and see if God can meet you there. What can take away from considering this point of view? What might you add? The comments section below is where you can share the answers to those questions, if you feel so moved. Please express your thoughts in ways that are constructive, purposeful, and respectful. Give those you disagree with the benefit of the doubt, and assume they are neither idiots nor evil. Name-calling, sweeping condemnations, and any other comments that suggest you have forgotten that we are all children of God will be deleted. Thank you!

3 Responses

  1. Mik Pazula says:


    1. Mayority rules is tyranny. Three wolves and two sheep trying to decide what's for lunch. The US is a republic set up at least with the goal of protecting the rights of the minority.
    2. The "stubborness that has defined the last four years"? The first two years had democratic hegemony in Congress and the White House. There was nothing the minority could even attempt to do. Whatever agenda for the poor you believe existed could have been bulldozed through into legislation. Your comments about
    3. It is most interesting that you couch this conversation in terms of "Christians concerned with justice for the poor" and then immediately assume that somewhere in the Scriptures there is a call for government enforced redistribution. The government only has what it takes away from someone else. That is only justice if you believe that everyone with money got it injustly. Or perhaps you believe in the ancient idea that my gain is your loss. But in either case turning the IRS into the modern version of the NT tax collector assuming that the government will do a better job than Caesar is naive.
    4. I hope that when the tax on those earning more that $250k you feel better about yourself, but it will make almost no difference. Symbolic gestures are just that, symbolic.

    I live and work among the "poor". I have friends who suffer from HIV/Aids. Please don't lecture me on what I don't know.

  2. Bill says:

    Did I miss the part where you also called for spending cuts, too?

    • swking says:

      Yes, of course, to bring down the national debt, which is a sinful burden to pass on to our children and grandchildren, we do think spending cuts are necessary, including cutting the defense budget by at least 100 billion dollars per year.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.